cobaltvstimesheet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cobalt | timesheet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 38/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #10 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 45 610 | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 800 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Svelte | Vue |
Which one should you pick?
cobalt scores 83/100 against 38/100 for timesheet, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; timesheet needs more configuration.
cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 800 stars in 30 days).
cobalt details →timesheet details →