cobaltvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cobalt | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 45 597 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 813 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Svelte | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
cobalt scores 83/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 813 stars in 30 days).
cobalt details →supabase-automated-self-host details →