# cobalt vs ScreenTinker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cobalt | ScreenTinker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 45 614 ✓ | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 804 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Svelte | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

cobalt scores 83/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.

ScreenTinker ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cobalt.

If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; ScreenTinker needs more configuration.

cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 804 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cobalt](https://selfhost.directory/project/cobalt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cobalt.md)
- [ScreenTinker](https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cobalt-vs-screentinker