cobaltvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cobalt | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 45 600 | 35 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 790 | +1 676 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Svelte | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
cobalt scores 83/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cobalt.
If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
cobalt details →RustFS details →