# cmux vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cmux | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Terminal | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 584 | 117 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 193 | +5 608 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 84 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | cmux-app-ffi-60c81bb2e9bab9fefa5217e88d67ae225960c06f · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Swift | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 80/100 for cmux, so it is the safer default.

cmux ships more often: 84 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, cmux is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cmux](https://selfhost.directory/project/cmux) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cmux.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cmux-vs-tradingagents