cmuxvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cmux | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Terminal | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 585 | 117 928 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 212 | +5 569 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 84 | 11 |
| Latest release | cmux-app-ffi-60c81bb2e9bab9fefa5217e88d67ae225960c06f · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Swift | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 80/100 for cmux, so it is the safer default.
cmux ships more often: 84 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, cmux is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).
cmux details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep cmux, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with