# CMS Made Simple vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CMS Made Simple | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 42 in Content Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | — | 471 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

CMS Made Simple scores 64/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CMS Made Simple.

If you want the quickest setup, CMS Made Simple is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

## Details

- [CMS Made Simple](https://selfhost.directory/project/cms-made-simple) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cms-made-simple.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cms-made-simple-vs-typetype