# CMS Made Simple vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CMS Made Simple | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 42 in Content Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | — | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 64/100 for CMS Made Simple, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CMS Made Simple.

If you want the quickest setup, CMS Made Simple is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CMS Made Simple](https://selfhost.directory/project/cms-made-simple) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cms-made-simple.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cms-made-simple-vs-tube-archivist