cloudtunesvsFunkwhale
Two self-hosted Spotify alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cloudtunes | Funkwhale | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming | #7 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 508 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | CoffeeScript | — |
Which one should you pick?
Funkwhale scores 63/100 against 44/100 for cloudtunes, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Funkwhale is easier to run; cloudtunes needs more configuration.
cloudtunes is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
cloudtunes details →Funkwhale details → All Spotify alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep cloudtunes, compare it with
Keep Funkwhale, compare it with