# Cloudreve vs 墨台 · VibeHolding

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Cloudreve | 墨台 · VibeHolding |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 900 ✓ | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.19.1 · 18 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Cloudreve scores 77/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.

Cloudreve ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.

If you want the quickest setup, Cloudreve is easier to run; 墨台 · VibeHolding needs more configuration.

Cloudreve is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Cloudreve](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve.md)
- [墨台 · VibeHolding](https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloudreve-vs-vibe-holding