# Cloudreve vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Cloudreve | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 28 902 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 4.19.1 · 18 Sept 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Cloudreve scores 77/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Cloudreve.

If you want the quickest setup, Cloudreve is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.

Cloudreve is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Cloudreve](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloudreve-vs-urocissa