# Cloudreve vs sysmon

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Cloudreve | sysmon |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #85 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 28 902 ✓ | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.19.1 · 18 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | CSS |

## Which one should you pick?

Cloudreve scores 77/100 against 41/100 for sysmon, so it is the safer default.

Cloudreve ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sysmon.

If you want the quickest setup, Cloudreve is easier to run; sysmon needs more configuration.

Cloudreve is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Cloudreve](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve.md)
- [sysmon](https://selfhost.directory/project/sysmon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sysmon.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloudreve-vs-sysmon