# Cloudreve vs Qtap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Cloudreve | Qtap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 28 901 ✓ | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.19.1 · 18 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Cloudreve scores 77/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

Cloudreve ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.

If you want the quickest setup, Cloudreve is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

Cloudreve is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Cloudreve](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve.md)
- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloudreve-vs-qtap