# Cloudreve vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Cloudreve | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 28 900 ✓ | 6 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +149 | +229 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | 4.19.1 · 18 Sept 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Cloudreve scores 77/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Cloudreve.

## Details

- [Cloudreve](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloudreve-vs-pulse