# Cloudreve vs portabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Cloudreve | portabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #3 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 894 ✓ | 1 860 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +143 ✓ | +95 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 64 ✓ |
| Latest release | 4.19.1 · 18 Sept 2026 | 1.35.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Cloudreve scores 77/100 against 60/100 for portabase, so it is the safer default.

portabase ships more often: 64 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Cloudreve.

If you want the quickest setup, Cloudreve is easier to run; portabase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Cloudreve](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve.md)
- [portabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloudreve-vs-portabase