# Cloudreve vs Healthchecks

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Cloudreve | Healthchecks |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 28 901 ✓ | 10 466 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 ✓ | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | 4.19.1 · 18 Sept 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Cloudreve scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Cloudreve ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

If you want the quickest setup, Cloudreve is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Cloudreve](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloudreve.md)
- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloudreve-vs-healthchecks