CloudlogvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Cloudlog | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Amateur Radio | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 577 | 118 239 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +5 880 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2.8.21 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 57/100 for Cloudlog, so it is the safer default.
Cloudlog ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Cloudlog needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 880 stars in 30 days).
Cloudlog details →TradingAgents details →