cloudberryvsgrowthbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cloudberry | growthbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #23 of 40 in Database Management | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 1 437 | 8 545 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 | +124 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2.1.0-incubating · 6 May 2026 | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
growthbook scores 71/100 against 60/100 for cloudberry, so it is the safer default.
growthbook ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for cloudberry.
If you want the quickest setup, growthbook is easier to run; cloudberry needs more configuration.
growthbook is growing faster right now (+124 stars in 30 days).
cloudberry details →growthbook details →
Swap a project
Keep cloudberry, compare it with
Keep growthbook, compare it with