# clonarr vs cobalt

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | clonarr | cobalt |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #70 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 190 | 45 595 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 811 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Svelte |

## Which one should you pick?

cobalt scores 83/100 against 49/100 for clonarr, so it is the safer default.

clonarr ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cobalt.

If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; clonarr needs more configuration.

cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 811 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [clonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/clonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clonarr.md)
- [cobalt](https://selfhost.directory/project/cobalt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cobalt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clonarr-vs-cobalt