CloakBrowservszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CloakBrowser | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 32 583 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +225 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+225 stars in 30 days).
CloakBrowser details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with