CloakBrowservsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CloakBrowser | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 32 583 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +225 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+225 stars in 30 days).
CloakBrowser details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with