# CloakBrowser vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 32 584 ✓ | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +226 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

ytdlp_web_player ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+226 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-ytdlpwebplayer