CloakBrowservsYarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CloakBrowser | Yarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 32 588 | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +230 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 4 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.
CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Yarr is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+230 stars in 30 days).
CloakBrowser details →Yarr details →
Swap a project
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with
Keep Yarr, compare it with