# CloakBrowser vs Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 32 583 ✓ | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +225 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.

CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP).

If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+225 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-wrp