# CloakBrowser vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 32 581 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, CloakBrowser is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-wraft