# CloakBrowser vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 32 583 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +225 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+225 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-wps-office