# CloakBrowser vs vito

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | vito |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #4 of 27 in Server Management |
| GitHub stars | 32 587 ✓ | 3 259 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.2.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 64/100 for vito, so it is the safer default.

vito ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

If you want the quickest setup, vito is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [vito](https://selfhost.directory/project/vito) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vito.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-vito