# CloakBrowser vs usque

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | usque |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #29 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 32 575 ✓ | 1 505 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +217 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.2.1 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 53/100 for usque, so it is the safer default.

usque ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+217 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [usque](https://selfhost.directory/project/usque) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/usque.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-usque