# CloakBrowser vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 32 589 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +231 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+231 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api