# CloakBrowser vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 32 586 ✓ | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +228 ✓ | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+228 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-unopim