# CloakBrowser vs UmlautAdaptarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | UmlautAdaptarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 32 587 ✓ | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.

CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for UmlautAdaptarr.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [UmlautAdaptarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-umlautadaptarr