# CloakBrowser vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 32 560 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +202 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+202 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-umap