# CloakBrowser vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 32 581 | 39 767 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +771 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 75/100 for CloakBrowser, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-umami