# CloakBrowser vs txtdot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | txtdot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 32 586 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +228 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 47/100 for txtdot, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, txtdot is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+228 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [txtdot](https://selfhost.directory/project/txtdot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/txtdot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-txtdot