# CloakBrowser vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 32 557 ✓ | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +199 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-transfersh