# CloakBrowser vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 32 556 | 117 704 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +198 | +5 345 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 75/100 for CloakBrowser, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-tradingagents