CloakBrowservstiledesk
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CloakBrowser | tiledesk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #46 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 32 587 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1 |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.2.1 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Mustache |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 51/100 for tiledesk, so it is the safer default.
CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tiledesk.
If you want the quickest setup, CloakBrowser is easier to run; tiledesk needs more configuration.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).
CloakBrowser details →tiledesk details →
Swap a project
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with
Keep tiledesk, compare it with