# CloakBrowser vs Obscura

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | Obscura |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 32 557 ✓ | 29 526 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +199 | +442 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser and Obscura score the same (75/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; CloakBrowser needs more configuration.

Obscura is growing faster right now (+442 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-obscura