# CloakBrowser vs figranium

> Two self-hosted [Browser Automation projects](https://selfhost.directory/browser-automation), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CloakBrowser | figranium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 11 in Browser Automation |
| GitHub stars | 32 560 ✓ | 778 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +202 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.21.2 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 52/100 for figranium, so it is the safer default.

figranium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for CloakBrowser.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+202 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)
- [figranium](https://selfhost.directory/project/figranium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/figranium.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cloakbrowser-vs-figranium