clickhousevsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clickhouse | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 50 656 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +615 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 | 9 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
clickhouse scores 87/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
clickhouse is growing faster right now (+615 stars in 30 days).
clickhouse details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →