clickhousevswyoming-openwakeword
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clickhouse | wyoming-openwakeword | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 50 656 | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +615 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 | 1 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
clickhouse scores 87/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.
clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wyoming-openwakeword.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-openwakeword is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.
clickhouse is growing faster right now (+615 stars in 30 days).
clickhouse details →wyoming-openwakeword details →