# clickhouse vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | clickhouse | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 50 650 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +609 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

clickhouse scores 87/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.

clickhouse is growing faster right now (+609 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [clickhouse](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clickhouse-vs-uusec-waf