# clickhouse vs rpi-mqtt-monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | clickhouse | rpi-mqtt-monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 50 654 ✓ | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +613 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

clickhouse scores 87/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, rpi-mqtt-monitor is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.

clickhouse is growing faster right now (+613 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [clickhouse](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse.md)
- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clickhouse-vs-rpi-mqtt-monitor