# clickhouse vs monocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | clickhouse | monocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #70 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 50 656 ✓ | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +615 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

clickhouse scores 87/100 against 47/100 for monocker, so it is the safer default.

clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for monocker.

If you want the quickest setup, monocker is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.

clickhouse is growing faster right now (+615 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [clickhouse](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse.md)
- [monocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/monocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clickhouse-vs-monocker