clickhousevsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clickhouse | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 50 658 | 132 674 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +617 | +3 317 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 | 1461 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 87/100 for clickhouse, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 180 for clickhouse.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 317 stars in 30 days).
clickhouse details →llama.cpp details →