# clickhouse vs FossFLOW

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | clickhouse | FossFLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #9 of 12 in Diagramming |
| GitHub stars | 50 659 ✓ | 226 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +602 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.5 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

clickhouse scores 87/100 against 47/100 for FossFLOW, so it is the safer default.

clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for FossFLOW.

If you want the quickest setup, FossFLOW is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.

clickhouse is growing faster right now (+602 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [clickhouse](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse.md)
- [FossFLOW](https://selfhost.directory/project/fossflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fossflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clickhouse-vs-fossflow