# GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 109 348 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +9 441 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 441 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clickhouse-etl-vs-orca