# GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL vs Kestra

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | Kestra |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 30 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 737 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 59 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Kestra scores 82/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.

Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.

If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.

Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl.md)
- [Kestra](https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kestra.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kestra vs prefect](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kestra-vs-prefect)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clickhouse-etl-vs-kestra