# GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL vs dify

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | dify |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #1 of 7 in AI Workflows |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 159 861 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 735 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | 1.18.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

dify scores 90/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.

dify ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.

If you want the quickest setup, dify is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.

dify is growing faster right now (+2 735 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl.md)
- [dify](https://selfhost.directory/project/dify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dify.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clickhouse-etl-vs-dify