# GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL vs Dagu

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | Dagu |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #10 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 4 476 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +405 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 65 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | v2.24.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Dagu scores 68/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.

Dagu ships more often: 65 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.

If you want the quickest setup, Dagu is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.

Dagu is growing faster right now (+405 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl.md)
- [Dagu](https://selfhost.directory/project/dagu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dagu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clickhouse-etl-vs-dagu